JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Home
  • Portugal 2023
  • About
  • Gallery
    • This Was STC Santorini 2023
    • This Was STC Miami 2021
    • This Was STC Santorini 2018
    • This Was STC Miami 2016
    • This Was STC Santorini 2015
    • This Was STC Miami 2015 – Temple House
    • This Was STC Miami 2014
    • This Was STC L.A. 2013
    • This Was STC Bahamas 2013
    • This Was Miami – STC Oct 13-14, 2012 Seminar / Workshop
    • This Was STC Miami 2012
    • This Was STC Vegas 2011 – 2
    • This Was STC Vegas 2011 – 1
    • This Was Miami 2011
  • Model Search
  • Store
  • Blog
  • Contact

Blog

Canon’s supertele marries flexibility with quality

Posted on: 07-11-2013 Posted in: Photography

Text by Stephen Shankland

  • The good: The Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4X combines terrific optics, autofocus, and image stabilization with standout flexibility from a built-in telephoto extender.
  • The bad: Few can afford the $11,800 price; 8.3 pounds is a lot to carry around; there’s some vignetting when shooting wide open.
  • The bottom line: You get you what you pay for with the Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4X: superlative performance and flexibility.

 

Maybe money can buy you happiness after all

I’m very impressed with Canon’s hulking but versatile supertelephoto, the EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4x. If what makes you happy is sharp-focus shots of skittish wildlife, racing motorcycles, and air show jets, this lens delivers.

But its price tag — $11,800 — means only professionals and the best-funded hobbyists will get the chance to buy that happiness.

The lens’ tremendously useful trick is a built-in 1.4x telephoto extender that, with the flip of a lever, changes it from a 200-400mm f4 lens into a 280-560mm f5.6 lens. That single trick means that this lens costs nearly twice what Nikon charges for its 200-400mm f4 competitor.

The price isn’t too far out of line with other very high-end telephotos — $11,000 for Canon’s EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM, for example, or $10,400 for its EF 500mm f/4L IS II USM Lens. However, the sad reality is a lot of Canon customers were hoping for something priced more like Nikon’s $6,500 AF-S Nikkor 200-400mm f/4G ED VR II or that offered better performance than Canon’s EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM design, with its elderly first-generation image stabilization and middling sharpness. It’s hard not to bridle after seeing how Canon raised the price of its 24-70mm f2.8 lenses from about $1,300 to $2,100 moving from its first-generation to second-generation design.

 

Price aside, the lens is super

ales-mini-ad-200-smIn my testing on a Canon EOS 5D Mark III, I found the lens sharp either with or without the 1.4x extender engaged. There’s no need to stop down, either; the maximum aperture of f4 at 200-400mm or f5.6 at 280-560mm performs admirably. Its autofocus operation is snappy, its magnesium-alloy build is rugged, the image stabilization is effective, and its 2-meter close-focus distance is good for nearby subjects like hummingbirds at a feeder. Distortion was minimal, and bokeh was creamy. My only complaint about the optics was significant vignetting when shooting wide open.

Using the built-in 1.4x extender quickly becomes routine. At the Paris Air Show, I’d have the lens all the way out at 560mm for a small stunt plane’s acrobatics, then flip the lever and take the zoom to 200mm for a hulking Airbus A380 taxiing nearby. Walking in the Bois de Boulogne forest, I’d quickly shift from 560mm for small birds to 300mm or 400mm for comparatively fearless mallards. It takes almost no time to learn how to move your hand from the shutter release button to the 1.4x lever to change the range. There’s a lock to keep it at one setting or the other, but I never had any trouble with the mechanism.

The built-in extender is useful enough that I could imagine it cropping up elsewhere in Canon’s lens line. It adds a lot of complexity to the design — the lens goes from 25 lens elements at 200-400mm to 33 lens elements when the 1.4x extender is engaged. But Canon tuned the 1.4x extender’s optics for this particular lens to keep image quality higher than with external extenders, and I could see a pro photographer enjoying the ability to change a 300mm f2.8 to a 420mm f4 even at the cost of one stop of exposure. The only real awkwardness I had with the extender was remembering to open up the aperture to f4 from f5.6 when disengaging the extender.

Canon_200-400mm_extender

The standout feature of the Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4x lens is a built-in 1.4x telephoto extender. It’s operated by flipping a lever near the camera end of the lens. The feature comes at a cost: the lens has a suggested price of $11,799 and weighs 8.3 pounds.

 

At 8.3 pounds (3.6kg), the lens is heavy. If you don’t have a monopod or tripod (or mammoth shoulder muscles), you’ll quickly tire of holding it up. And it’s bulky, 14.4 inches (36.6cm) long without its lens hood. The size and weight are par for the course for supertelephoto lenses, but that doesn’t make it any easier to track fast-moving subjects like pirouetting helicopters and skittish birds.

Fortunately, the image stabilization helps a lot. For stationary subjects, I was able to shoot at 560mm at 1/40 sec. with blur-free results about half the time, even without leaning against walls, cars, or trees for stability. When the supermoon fortuitously arrived while I had the lens for testing, I shot handheld with my own 1.4x extender attached for a 784mm f8 configuration with consistently good results at 1/250 sec.

Sharpness diminished with my second-generation Canon 1.4x extender attached, but I was still impressed. And the hassle of putting on the extender, in particular with a lens this large, made me appreciate the convenience of having one built in all the more.

The lens, a member of Canon’s high-end L-series family, is admirably sturdy, with seals to protect against water and dust. The operation of all the controls is easy, with comfortable ribbed rubber grips for zoom and focus.

Canon_200-400mm_vignetting

Vignetting is a minor but noticeable issue with the Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4X, chiefly when shooting wide open. This shot was at 560mm, f5.6, 1/1,000 sec., at ISO 200.

 

On the lens barrel are a lot of switches for a lens. Closest to the camera is a switch to set the lens focus range — either the full range, 2 to 6 meters, or 6 meters to infinity. Next to that switch is the autofocus setting: autofocus, manual focus, or the newer power focus, a movie-oriented feature that uses a motor to smoothly change the focus.

Mount   Canon EF
Focal range   200-400mm without 1.4x extender; 280-560mm with extender
Aperture range   f4 without extender; f5.6 with extender
Minimum focus distance   6.5ft/2m
Angle of view   6.2-12 degrees without extender; 4.4-8.8 degrees with extender
Elements   25 without extender, including fluorite and ultra-low dispersion glass; 33 with extender
Coating(s)   fluorine on front and back elements for dirt resistance; SWC (subwavelength structure coating) to cut flare and ghosting
Filter diameter   52mm drop-in
Length   14.4 in./366mm
Diameter   5in/128mm
Weight   127.7oz/3620g
MSRP   $11,799

Farther out on the barrel is the switch for choosing stabilization modes: 1 for full image stabilization, 2 for vertical-only stabilization for panning shots, and 3 for engaging stabilization only after you’ve pushed the shutter release button. Here you can also set a an autofocus preset that’s useful when you can predict a subject’s distance — the point on a track where a race car comes into view, for example, or the watering hole on a safari.

The lens is well suited for sports and wildlife photographers who benefit from some flexibility. Those who specialize in birds might well be better off with Canon’s 500mm or 600mm f4L lenses, perhaps augmented with a 1.4x telephoto extender. Birds, unless comfortable around humans, are generally small, fast-moving, and far away. That means the 200mm end of the 200-400mm lens’ range isn’t terribly useful, and f5.6 is a notch slower when you’re at maximum telephoto.

Just getting the lens out into the field is an ordeal. It comes with its own suitcase and shoulder strap, but I found it more convenient to reconfigure my unusually large camera backpack. Most camera daypacks won’t be able to hold it, though.

Canon_200-400mm_sharpness

The Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4X can be moved rapidly from 200mm to 560mm by flipping the 1.4x extender lever and rotating the zoom ring, something that’s handy as air show planes come and go. Click the image for a look at the sharpness of the planes. This shot was at 225mm, but moments earlier the jets were far enough away that 560mm was appropriate.

 

Many photographers in the market for a lens like this will already have sturdy tripods, gimbal mounts, and big packs, but if you don’t, the high cost of this lens will be supplemented by some expensive accessories. Compared to the cost of the lens itself, though, it’s pocket change.

The price is easier to stomach when you think about what it would cost to stretch from 200mm to 560mm so rapidly. To handle that range without the laborious process of attaching a teleconverter, you’d need two camera bodies and two lenses. Even with more affordable options, such as the $1,700 100-400mm or Canon’s $1,340 EF 400mm f/5.6L USM with a 1.4x extender attached, you’re talking about thousands of dollars, an aperture of f8 at 560mm, and a lack of image stabilization at the long end that puts more limits on your shutter speed.

Other options are Sigma’s 150-500mm F5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM or its $1,000 120-400mm F4.5-5.6 DG APO OS HSM with a teleconverter. These are geared more for consumers, though, and come with compromises in sharpness and aperture.

Perhaps the best alternative would be to get a crop-frame camera body such as Canon’s 7D or new 70D and the Canon 100-400mm. With the 1.6x focal-length multiplier, you’d be looking at an equivalent of 160-640mm, and you won’t suffer the autofocus limitations of shooting at f8.

There’s no question what the most desirable option is, though: the superb image quality and supertelephoto flexibility of Canon’s extendable 200-400mm. It’s no wonder Canon is charging a premium.

Credit: Stephen Shankland

LEARN-PHOTOGRAPHY-DIGITAL-BOOKS-ALES

 

  • Popular Posts
  • Related Posts
  • Write for us sponsored posts
    Write for us sponsored posts
  • Learning how to take the best photography
    Learning how to take the best photography
  • Sarah Lyons - From STC Attendee to FHM Cover Model
    Sarah Lyons - From STC Attendee to FHM Cover Model
  • How Your Photography Portfolio Can Help You Avoid Rejection
    How Your Photography Portfolio Can Help You Avoid Rejection
  • Write for us sponsored posts
    Write for us sponsored posts
  • Learning how to take the best photography
    Learning how to take the best photography
  • Sarah Lyons - From STC Attendee to FHM Cover Model
    Sarah Lyons - From STC Attendee to FHM Cover Model
  • How Your Photography Portfolio Can Help You Avoid Rejection
    How Your Photography Portfolio Can Help You Avoid Rejection

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Twitter Feed

    Twitter not configured.

Archives

  • February 2025
  • August 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • April 2022
  • September 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • September 2010

Search Blog

Recent Posts

  • Write for us sponsored posts Write for us sponsored posts
    02-20-2025
  • Learning how to take the best photography Learning how to take the best photography
    02-20-2025
  • Sarah Lyons - From STC Attendee to FHM Cover Model Sarah Lyons - From STC Attendee to FHM Cover Model
    08-17-2023

Popular Posts

Every photographer has a story to tell …
© 2011-2023 Shoot The Centerfold. All Rights Reserved
  • Privacy Policy
  • Customer Support
  • Ordering Details FAQ
  • Payment Methods
  • Return Policy FAQ
  • License Agreement
TwitterStumbleUponRedditDiggdel.icio.usFacebookLinkedIn