Five reasons why you shouldn’t pirate Photoshop CC (or any other software)
Photographers are all the same. We all get irate when asked to shoot a friend’s wedding for next to nothing. Taking pictures of a new band for their next gig is seen as doing you a favor. We raise holy heck when a concert promoter offers to comp our tickets instead of providing a check for services rendered. A newspaper or website wants to give us a credit line in lieu of payment because it’ll give us more “exposure.”
Yet here we are, expecting the art industry to be taken seriously, but have no compunctions of “borrowing” software from a torrent because we want to save a few bucks. Besides, they make more than enough cash off people and little freebie won’t hurt them, right? Wrong. By pirating Photoshop or other photo-editing software, the only message we send out is that we don’t actually care about them at all.
The main impetus for Adobe’s move new Photoshop CC – a cloud-based software (not service, to be clear) – is to deter software piracy by having it only available and distributed online. The truth is that Adobe’s move to cloud-based distribution does effectively crack down on some piracy, but not from a technological perspective, rather, an economic one. (The proverbial carrot instead of the proverbial stick.)
With today’s desktop-based suite, you need to spend $700 to use the standard full version of Photoshop. In Creative Cloud, you can start using it for $30 per month, or $240 per year. The bar for entry is much lower so it’s reasonably available to anyone.
In other words, Adobe isn’t going to stop the hardcore hacker from pirating its software, even if the company distributes the product from its own servers. However, it may provide enough economic incentive for regular people to pay up.
(As a brief aside: Have you ever stopped to think how strange it is that “Photoshop” has crept into linguistic usage as a word to describe the manipulation of images? In one sense, sure… Adobe dominates the market. In another sense, this is crazy, because the vast majority of regular people who use this term have never used this quite expensive piece of professional software. That’s multiples of the price Microsoft levies for its Office suite and about the average price consumers pay for an entire laptop. So you start to wonder – just how many people have encountered a pirated version of Photoshop, exactly?)
We can look to Apple and iTunes in this regard – one part of the reason that company made so many inroads in the purchase of media is that it made it seamless; a second part is that it made it cheaper. Instead of $15 for a likely indulgent Kanye West album, I can buy a few songs for $1 each. Instead of a $30 DVD for Season One of the television series “Mad Men,” I can buy the one or two episodes I missed for $3 each. This vibrant ecosystem has mostly curbed the casual piracy practiced by normal people in the heady days of Napster and its ilk at the turn of the millennium.
Does a product cost more à la carte? Sure. But this is comparing apples to oranges – there is value in the smaller unit’s convenience and accessibility. Sure, some people prefer warehouse-style purchases that emphasize quantity, but for another set, it’s the lack of it that is most valuable. Some people will happily pay more for less product. Not everyone wants two gallons of mustard when all they need is enough for a sandwich.
(Ever tell a cashier “Keep the change?” because you didn’t want to deal with it? At that moment, you are making a decision to pay more for less product. In this case, currency itself.)
By lowering the entry price of its software suite and the unit of value that corresponds to it, Adobe has made its flagship software more accessible to more people in an age when digital media manipulation is more democratic than ever… A smart move that expands its potential customer base, and it also may be enough to push piracy back to the fringe.
Here are six more reasons why you shouldn’t pirate Photoshop CC:
- 1. You are committed enough to take your business seriously.
- 2. Support photography communities and manufacturers who will support you.
- 3. Pirated copies are buggy and do not always work as planned.
- 4. Receive updates, support and always have the best and the latest copy available.
- 5. Getting sued for copyright infringement.
- 6. Because you are an honest person!
$700 software is just one more reason the vast majority of “photographers” are either amateurs with day jobs – or giving workshops for them.
Not sure I understand the gist of your comment. I think I understand and agree. Are you saying people who use photoshop are something besides photographers, or that the people giving workshops are amateurs? Or both?
Mr. John Kantor, so you are saying that stealing is ok? I sure hope that I misunderstood you.
To address No. 3…… Legitimate copies are also “buggy” and do not always work as planned. Evidenced by Adobe’s move to a forum approach for online support and technical questions. Look at the post counts on those boards…
But we, real photographers, definitely don’t use Photoshop. Photos should look great straight out of the camera. Don’t they?
Shut up with your egotistical shit, for some people, photoshop and Lightroom are like developing film negatives. I suppose you also shoot also in jpeg because you “always get it 100% right in camera” too? No one does.
Have to say that what Adobe is doing with the CC is quite smart, although should have been done ages ago. I don’t think here in Argentina I have met anyone with a legitimate copy of Photoshop (let alone a legitimate OS) in their computers. Here it’s ridiculously common piracy. Here burned copies of movie DVDs are sold everywhere openly for several years with no one cracking down on it. Some people are just accustomed to having pirated, lower quality things and never really noticed the higher quality and advantage of legitimate copies.
Adobe is finally figuring it all out. At the beginning of this CC mess they were trying to charge me
$49.00 a month to upgrade to the cloud when I had just spent the $2,600 for CS6 Master Collection. I did not feel that was right from being a long time supporter of past purchases.
Yesterday I received an email advertisement that up until July 21st CS6 master suite owners can upgrade to CC for only $19.99 a month.
Which is more like it for us that just put out the bucks for the tiny retail box with 2 discs. (Things have changed from the early days of big software boxes with documentation)
Had I known they had CC planned as an only option I would have saved the cash.
PIRACY is theft no matter how you look at it!
The way i see it is If you don’t like Adobe’s current Business plan then don’t do business with them. There is many free and cheaper options for those amateurs who feel they can’t afford it.
Adobe has always been for the professionals!!! PS Elements was made for that the Vast majority of amateurs that can’t afford it.
It is no worse then a Cell phone bill or a Cable Bill and there is no big old school upfront investment.
Hardly anyone’s gonna shit $700 dollars outta their ass for an image editor.