JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Home
  • Portugal 2023
  • About
  • Gallery
    • This Was STC Santorini 2023
    • This Was STC Miami 2021
    • This Was STC Santorini 2018
    • This Was STC Miami 2016
    • This Was STC Santorini 2015
    • This Was STC Miami 2015 – Temple House
    • This Was STC Miami 2014
    • This Was STC L.A. 2013
    • This Was STC Bahamas 2013
    • This Was Miami – STC Oct 13-14, 2012 Seminar / Workshop
    • This Was STC Miami 2012
    • This Was STC Vegas 2011 – 2
    • This Was STC Vegas 2011 – 1
    • This Was Miami 2011
  • Model Search
  • Store
  • Blog
  • Contact

Blog

Can you do reliable workflow with Magic Lantern?

Posted on: 08-7-2013 Posted in: Photography

Lots of questions are bouncing around as to whether it is safe to make a commercial production with Magic Lantern software running on a Canon EOS 5D mk III. There are several answers to this, and it’s by no means certain that any of them are a definite  “yes”. In order to understand why, it’s a good idea to look at this question in the light of two completely different scenarios.

Design and Production

First, let’s look at how a major Japanese manufacturer designs and makes a product.

When a new camera comes to market from one of the major players, it’s rarely the result of a back-of-an-envelope idea. What’s more likely is that the product has been in planning for more than a year, and that it’s based on a perceived gap in the marketplace. It will be developed in a way that minimises the need for additional tools and technology, while still giving the new device a competitive advantage.

It’s a complex process, that’s well tuned. And it’s also why you don’t often get big surprises from big companies – but what you do get is a product that is generally delivered on time, and which is absolutely rock solid. Which is what you want if your business and your reputation depend on it.

Most of all, these products are tested to within an inch of their lives. There’s almost no chance of something slipping out with a serious bug. In fact, this happens so rarely, that when it does, it’s big news. Even though modern cameras are largely software-defined devices, buying a camera from a big Japanese manufacturer is as close as you can get these days to buying a “thing” in the old fashioned sense.

Reliability of Magic Lantern

Now, let’s look at it from the Magic Lantern angle (and this isn’t just about ML: its about anyone who “hacks” into a product to gain functionality.)

First of all, let’s get rid of the idea that because the ML software is running on Canon’s hardware it must be reliable, because the moment you install a single byte of “alien” code on a third-party’s product, all the testing is completely invalidated. In a sense software like ML’s would be treated by the original manufacturer as one giant bug.

You can expect absolutely no support from Canon if you’re running other people’s software, and no sympathy either. And you can understand why: not only do Canon not have any control over any foreign software installed on their cameras, but this represents a disruptive attack on their business model as well. Remember how we said that each new product is planned and fitted into the optimum place in the manufacturer’s product hierarchy? Well, running software that means a camera costing a few thousand dollars can challenge another one in your range that costs five times as much is a situation that’s not likely to be welcomed with open arms.

The risks of using Magic Lantern on Canon

But aside from all of that: how safe is it to run ML software on Canon hardware if you’re using it for serious projects?

The real answer depends on how well you know the software and how it works with your camera. Ultimately using software like this in professional situations comes down to risk analysis and risk avoidance.

Why is it so risky? Because, brilliant though the whole Magic Lantern project is, it hasn’t been tested to anything like the same extent that the original camera has been. Introduce your modified camera to a situation that the ML writers hadn’t envisaged, and anything could happen – and I mean anything. This could range from a minor blemish in the picture to the camera destroying itself or even catching fire. If that sounds extreme, remember that the ML software makes cameras do stuff there were never supposed to do. Pushing raw, uncompressed video around a device that was only ever intended to work with highly compressed media means stressing components to their limits – and possibly beyond. Of course, we’re playing devil’s advocate here. We’re looking at the worst possible case. In fact, we’ve always been impressed by the way that ML tries to avoid damage to your camera by making the software boot from an external card.

Limiting the risks

Just like how a truck accident attorney calls it important to save you from the financial aftermath of accidents, the only foolproof answer to this too, is insurance. Obviously, you need professional liability insurance – you should have that anyway – but you need to insure yourself against failure of the camera and loss of material. In other words, you need to make sure that your business and reputation will survive if you have a catastrophic failure.

This isn’t easy. If you absolutely must have raw images from a camera that doesn’t support them natively then you’re going to have to use ML. So there will always be risks. The performance of the camera is on your critical path. If it fails, the project fails. All you can do is understand the performance of the camera/Magic Lantern combination so well that you at least have the benefit of past experience to inform you whether what you’re trying to do is likely to work.

Would I use ML for professional work? Only if I had the shoot covered with another camera – and cameras that can compare with the raw output of a 5D are expensive.

So it’s expense versus risk. It’s as simple as that.

But if I was making my own production, for fun, and perhaps with a more serious intent, then, yes, I probably would. Creating a piece of art with something that was never meant to be can only add to the fascination of the finished work.

STC-LA-seminar-568-banner
© 2013 Copyright ShootTheCenterfold.com. All rights reserved

  • Popular Posts
  • Related Posts
  • Write for us sponsored posts
    Write for us sponsored posts
  • Learning how to take the best photography
    Learning how to take the best photography
  • Sarah Lyons - From STC Attendee to FHM Cover Model
    Sarah Lyons - From STC Attendee to FHM Cover Model
  • How Your Photography Portfolio Can Help You Avoid Rejection
    How Your Photography Portfolio Can Help You Avoid Rejection
  • Write for us sponsored posts
    Write for us sponsored posts
  • Learning how to take the best photography
    Learning how to take the best photography
  • Sarah Lyons - From STC Attendee to FHM Cover Model
    Sarah Lyons - From STC Attendee to FHM Cover Model
  • How Your Photography Portfolio Can Help You Avoid Rejection
    How Your Photography Portfolio Can Help You Avoid Rejection
  • (1) Comment
  • (0) Trackback
  1. Derrick08-07-13

    ML gives great quality, but it’s as buggy as they come!

    (reply)

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Twitter Feed

    Twitter not configured.

Archives

  • February 2025
  • August 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • April 2022
  • September 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • September 2010

Search Blog

Recent Posts

  • Write for us sponsored posts Write for us sponsored posts
    02-20-2025
  • Learning how to take the best photography Learning how to take the best photography
    02-20-2025
  • Sarah Lyons - From STC Attendee to FHM Cover Model Sarah Lyons - From STC Attendee to FHM Cover Model
    08-17-2023

Popular Posts

Every photographer has a story to tell …
© 2011-2023 Shoot The Centerfold. All Rights Reserved
  • Privacy Policy
  • Customer Support
  • Ordering Details FAQ
  • Payment Methods
  • Return Policy FAQ
  • License Agreement
TwitterStumbleUponRedditDiggdel.icio.usFacebookLinkedIn